Curse

ValaOfTheFens · Feb 14, 2007, 03:54 PM // 15:54

A one time fee is ok. ANet needs more RL moneysinks that people will actually go for besides more character slots. I wish you could buy all non-elite skills for PvE from the GW store. I'd pay alot for that.

MagicWarrior · Feb 14, 2007, 04:42 PM // 16:42

No to both. What drew me to Guild Wars was the no subscription fee (cause my available gaming time varies a lot). Of course, buying the different chapters can be seen as a subscription - but the key is that I have a choice WHEN I want to buy and not forced to every month. I wouldn't pay monthly for anything.

Gun Pierson · Feb 14, 2007, 04:51 PM // 16:51

Subscription: hell no, even not a small one.

One time fee: Yes!

Vinraith · Feb 14, 2007, 05:24 PM // 17:24

No to both. Any attempt to charge a subscription fee means I'm finished with the game and moving on too offline venues.

Nya · Feb 14, 2007, 05:24 PM // 17:24

Subscription fees for extra services? Definitely NO.
One-time fee for an auction house? No, if we ever get one I believe EVERYONE has the right to use it.
One-time fee for extra storage? Definitely YES.

MadOnion · Feb 14, 2007, 05:48 PM // 17:48

1) No
2) No

I will never pay any sort of subscription fee for guild wars, and I doubt I'd pay even a one time fee for those additions.

Kai Nui · Feb 14, 2007, 05:54 PM // 17:54

I want to pay a subscription. Second thought no.

Stemnin · Feb 14, 2007, 05:57 PM // 17:57

For me to say yes, the whole game would haft to be re-engineered, as great as it is, it's just lacking in areas that subscription based games have. Space and auctions are trivial things to what I really really want, I want to play as an Angchu Tengu!

Veripare · Feb 14, 2007, 05:59 PM // 17:59

No to both. If Guild Wars introduces optional subscription fees then the game will become more unbalanced as it already is.

Bankai · Feb 14, 2007, 06:00 PM // 18:00

Nope.

This post needs more characters.

milan · Feb 14, 2007, 06:31 PM // 18:31

No to both.
No to a one time fee on either also.

Auction house would be useless if it was only available to the people willing to pay rl money on it.

If the idea behind limited storage is to keep the ecomony churning by stopping people hoarding. charging a fee where only some of the players have access to expanded storage would defeat this.

Malice Black · Feb 14, 2007, 06:36 PM // 18:36

No, these are features that have been demanded many times and features that should be implemented with immediate effect.

So thats a big NO to both subscription fee and one time fee.

Commander Ryker · Feb 14, 2007, 06:46 PM // 18:46

1. NFW
2. NFW
3. Yes to one time fee.

Shmanka · Feb 14, 2007, 07:10 PM // 19:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxSilhouette

A subscription fee, No. A one time fee, Yes.

Honestly no, I just want extra runes for bags, puches and rucksacks. I want the material storage space to not have a 250 limit, but 1000 perhaps. I would stop complaining then.

Also I have 13 character slots on one account, and I have the small Xunlai agent space to share between them all. I think this is more then ridiculous I should have 3x the space.

Kook~NBK~ · Feb 14, 2007, 07:16 PM // 19:16

1. NO, NO, and NO again!

2. NO, NO and NO again!

wetsparks · Feb 14, 2007, 08:44 PM // 20:44

1. No
2. No

Frankly, I never have any problem with storage. Dont understand how people do have troubles, if your going to use, use it, if not sell it to someone who will. An auction house would be nice but if you dont over price it then you dont have problems selling things.

Yawgmoth · Feb 14, 2007, 09:19 PM // 21:19

No to any subscriptions, but

1) More storage space - horribly small storage is the number 1 issue in PvE that actually prevents me from playing it. So a major FREE storage update is really needed, then i wouldn't mind them selling even more storage space for $$, and maybe would even buy some.

2) The ability to use an auction system - i have an idea: how about implementing an auction house available for everyone for buying and a very limited selling ability. Then sell in the online store a 'Power-Seller pack' greatly increasing the seller's options and the number of items that can be auctioned. I would certainly buy that!

erfweiss · Feb 14, 2007, 09:22 PM // 21:22

I will not drop a dime on upgrades or subscriptions. Part of the appeal of this game is that it is free, once you pay for a campaign. The second a subscription is started, I'll find something else to do.

Captain Sarcastic · Feb 14, 2007, 09:27 PM // 21:27

No to both. I can see a one-time fee in game currency for theses, but not real world money.

Honestly, the no-subscription system is what got me into GW.

blood4blood · Feb 14, 2007, 09:38 PM // 21:38

No to both - I would not pay any subscription fees for anything in GW.

I would not pay a one-time fee for an auction house. This game is long overdue to have some sort of basic in-game trade system implemented. GW's utter failure to have any sort of in-game trade mechanism is one of its greatest failings. IMHO spamming chat and the little Trade section of the Search window are NOT trade systems, they barely qualify as inadequate afterthoughts at best.

I already have paid one-time fees for storage by buying additional accounts for me and my wife, just for storage.